A.Arumugam v. Narayanan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-04-2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Contempt Petition No.306 of 2016 A.Arumugam .. Petitioner.

Versus

Mr.Narayanan The Revenue Divisional Officer, Taluk Office Road, Ponneri.

.. Respondent.

Prayer:

Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 70/71 to punish the respondent for having committed contempt of Court for disobeying the order, dated 12.2.2013, made in W.P.No.8253 of 2012.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.Roofus Abraham Government Advocate

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent

2. At this stage of the hearing of the contempt petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent had submitted that the order passed by this

Court, on 12.2.2013, in W.P.No.8253 of 2012, had been complied with. He had placed the proceedings of the respondent, dated 9.3.2013, in support of his statement.

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had not refuted the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.

4. In such circumstances, since, no further orders are necessary, the contempt petition stands closed. No costs. csh SD/ JOINT REGISTRAR(OS) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2016. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

CO/20/05/2016 One CC to M/s.M.S.Subramanian, Advocate, SR.4557/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/