Anand v. State Rep. By

Crl.M.P.Nos.2146 & 2147 of 2016 in Crl.O.P.Nos.28112 & 28196 of 2015 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

Petitions for modification of bail condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.Nos.28112 and 28196 of 2015, dated 10.12.2015. 2.Mr.P.Kalimuthu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that on 10.12.2015, this Court has granted bail to the petitioner imposing condition to execute a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- [Rupees One Lakh only] in each case with two sureties [each of the sureties shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- in both cases and one of the sureties should be that of a Government servant in both cases] and comply with the bail condition before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Avinashi. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not having the Government surety from his family and friends side and therefore, he is not able to comply with the condition of this Court and hence, seeks modification.

3.The learned Government Advocate [Criminal Side] appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender and involved in the cases of murder, robbery and murder for gain.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

sri 4.Considering the antecedents of this petitioner, this Court is not inclined to modify the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.Nos.28112 and 28196 of 2015, dated 10.12.2015 and hence, these petitions are dismissed. 25.02.2016 sri Crl.M.P.Nos.2146 & 2147 of 2016 in Crl.O.P.Nos.28112 & 28196 of 2015 2/2