← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10025/2026disposed of

P.Saravanan v. The Commissioner

2026-03-23Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE P.Saravanan S/o P. Purantharan, No 81, Murugesa Nayakar office complex, Greams Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai 600 006 ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Park Town, Chennai 600 003

2. The Junior Engineer(J.E) Chennai Corporation, Ward 9, Division No 111, opp to Stella Maris college, Cathedral Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai 600 086

3. The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Veppery, Chennai ..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance writ of Mandamus to forbear the officials of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 from in any manner preventing or disturbing the petitioner from running Bunk Stall (Petti shop) business at Murugesa Nayakar office complex, No 81 Greams Raod, Thousand Lights, Chennai 600 006, by considering the petitioner's Representation dated 28.02.2026, within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court and pass orders.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.N.Vijaya Basker for M/s.Law Vision For Respondent(s):

Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu Standing Counsel For R1 & R2 Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate(Crl.Side) For R3

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to forbear the officials of the respondents 1 and 2 from in any manner preventing or disturbing the petitioner from running the bunk stall (Petty shop) more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition, based on the petitioner representation dated 28.02.2026.

2.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents 1 and 2 are now attempting to disturb the petitioner's running of the bunk stall (petty shop) at the address more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition. The petitioner claims that he is legally entitled to run the said bunk stall (petty shop) at the address more fully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. Since the petitioner's representation dated 28.02.2026 has not been considered by the respondents, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.

Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of 3rd respondent. 4.

The learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the petitioner does not have any legal right to run the bunk shop. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the said contention.

5.

No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated above, are directed to be considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 6.

This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

7.

For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the 1st respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representation dated 28.02.2026, seeking to forbear the officials of respondents 1 and 2 from in any manner preventing or disturbing the petitioner's running of the bunk stall (petty shop) at the address more fully

disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 23-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA To

1. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Park Town, Chennai 600 003

2. The Junior Engineer(J.E) Chennai Corporation, Ward 9, Division No 111, Opposite to stella Maris college, Cathedral Raod, gopalapuram, Chennai 600 086

3. The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai, Veppery, Chennai

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

RKA 23-03-2026