← Library
Madras High CourtWP/8532/2024disposed of

G.Raghupathy v. The Commissioner Of Police

2024-04-01Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.04.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI G.Raghupathy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kolathur, Chennai.

3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kolathur, Chennai.

4.The Inspector of Police, V-4, Rajamangalam Police Station, Chennai.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the petitioner's name from the History Sheet No. H.S.No.01 of 2012 dated 12.01.2012 on the file of 4th respondent herein based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2024.

Page No.1 of 5

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Pugalenthi For Respondents : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Govt. Adv. (Crl.Side) *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to remove the petitioner's name from the History Sheet No. H.S.No.01 of 2012 dated 12.01.2012 on the file of 4th respondent herein based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2024.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was branded as history sheeter and for removal of the same, the petitioner has made a representation to the respondents Police on 01.03.2024, however the same was not considered. Hence, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that, it would suffice, if the 4th respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 01.03.2024 and pass appropriate Page No.2 of 5

orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents has no serious objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

5. Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 01.03.2024 in terms of 747 and 748 of Police Standing Orders and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 01.04.2024 Index : Yes / No NCC:Yes/No sp To Page No.3 of 5

1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kolathur, Chennai.

3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kolathur, Chennai.

4.The Inspector of Police, V-4, Rajamangalam Police Station, Chennai.

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Page No.4 of 5

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

sp 01.04.2024 Page No.5 of 5