Tutan Das v. State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.03.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN 1.Tutan Das 2.Rajat Kandi Dey ... Petitioners Vs.

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police PEW Hosur Police Station Krishnagiri District (Crime No.145 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to enlarge the Petitioners on bail in Crime No.145 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Pradeep For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the Petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.03.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.145 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 4(1)(c), 4(1-A)(ii) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 2024.

1/5

2.The case of the prosecution is that the Petitioners were found to be in illegal possession of 27 litres of liquor.

3.Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the Petitioners are in custody from 02.03.2025 and they are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioners. 4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail to the Petitioners, reiterated the prosecution case. The learned Government Advocate further submitted that there are no previous cases against the petitioners. 5.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the nature of allegations, period of incarceration undergone by the Petitioners, the quantity of contraband seized in this case, and since further custody is not required for the purpose of interrogation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the Petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the Petitioners is ordered to be released on bail on their 2/5

executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Hosur and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the Petitioners shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the Petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the Petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

13.03.2025 sai 3/5

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

sai To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Hosur 2.The Inspector of Police PEW Hosur Police Station Krishnagiri District 3.The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Hosur.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/5

13.03.2025 5/5