← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/1755/2026allowed

Mohammed Meeran v. Krishna Kumar

2026-03-26Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.Thamilselvi5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND CMP NO. 8018 OF 2026,CRP NO. 1760 OF 2026,CMP NO. 8007 OF 2026

1. Mohammed Meeran S/o. Mohammed Younis Door No. 34/6, Keeraikara Street Kasba Tindivanam Tindivanam Petitioner(s) Vs

1. Krishna Kumar S/o. Ganabathi Mudaliyar Door No.1A, Pillaiyar Koil Street Roshanai Kasba Tindivanam Road Tindivanam Dt.

604001 Respondent(s) CRP No. 1760 of 2026

1. Mohammed Meeran, S/o. Mohammed Younis, Door No.

34/6, Keeraikara Street, Kasba Tindivanam, Tindivanam.

Appellant(s) Vs

1. Krishna Kumar, S/o. Ganabathi Mudaliyar, Door No.1A, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Roshanai, Kasba Tindivanam Road, Tindivanam Dt.

604001 Respondent(s)

PRAYER To set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A. No. 322 of 2025 in OS No. 317 of 2018 dt. 07.02.2026 on the file of Principal District Munsif Tindivanam by allowing the present CRP CRP No. 1760 of 2026 PRAYER To set aside the fair and Decreetal order passed in I.A. No. 321 of 2025 in OS No. 317 of 2018 dated 07.02.2026 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam, by allowing the present Civil Revision Petition and thereby render justice.

For Petitioner(s):

MR.ESWAR FOR M/S.Eswar, Kumar and Rao For Respondent(s):

ORDER

Aggrieved by the order passed by the Trial Judge in I.A. Nos. 321 & 322 of 2025 in OS No. 317 of 2018, on the file of Principal District Munsif Tindivanam, applications to reopen and recall, the defendant has preferred these revisions.

2. Before the Trial Court, immediately after the closure of the defendant's evidence, the petitioner filed an application to recall D.W.1 on the same day, in order to put forth certain important questions that arose after completion of the cross-examination. However, the Trial Court failed to grant such an opportunity.

3. Considering the fact that the suit is now posted for arguments and that the applications were filed immediately after closure of the defendant's evidence, this Court is of the view that the petitioner must be given an opportunity. If such opportunity is denied, the valuable right of the defendant to effectively defend the case would be defeated.

4. Accordingly, I.A. Nos. 321 & 322 of 2025 in OS No. 317 of 2018, on the file of Principal District Munsif Tindivanam, are set aside, and the said interlocutory applications are allowed. The learned Trial Judge is directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible.

5. Thus, the Civil Revision Petitions are allowed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. 26-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes rri To 1.The Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Madras.

T.V.THAMILSELVI J.

rri AND CMP NO. 8018 OF 2026,CRP NO. 1760 OF 2026,CMP NO. 8007 OF 26-03-2026