Tamil Nadu Arasu Paniyalar v. The Commissioner Of Civil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.07.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.13470 & 13521 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.2 & 2 of 2014 Tamil Nadu Arasu Paniyalar Sangam, Regd.No.149/2009 Rep by its President, G.Paul Pandian, No.62,Big Bazaar Street, Triplicane,Chennai -5.

...Petitioner in

W.P.No.13470 of 2014 Tamil Nadu Nugarvor Kooturavu Motha Virpanai Pandaga Salai Manila Anna Thozhilalar Sangam, Regd.No.3436/CNI, Rep by its State Secretary, B.Srinivasan, S/o.E.Balakrishnan, No.17, Tamil Nadu Housing Board Complex, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083.

..Petitioner in W.P.No.13521 of 2014 Vs.

1. The Commissioner of Civil Supplies, Chepauk, Chennai -5.

2. The Registrar of Coop. Societies, Kilpauk, Chennai-10 .. Respondents 1 and 2 in both W.Ps.

3 .The Managing Director, Triplicane Urban Coop. Society, No.159, Big Street, Triplicane, Chennai-5.

...3rd Respondent in W.P.No. 13521 of 2014

PRAYER IN BOTH W.Ps.: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.E1/8189/11, dated 08.04.2014 and the quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam in both WPs For Respondents : Mr.L.P.Shanmuga Sundaram for R1 in both Wps & R3 in W.P. No.13521/2014 : Mrs. T.Girija, Government Advocate in both W.Ps

O R D E R

These two writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner Associations, challenging the order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.E1/8189/11, dated 08.04.2014.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that subsequent to the order impugned herein, the 1st respondent has passed orders in Na.Ka. No.E1/8189/11 dated 06.05.2014. In view of the same, the present writ petitions have become infructuous.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner Associations fairly agreed to the same and sought permission of this Court, to grant liberty to challenge the subsequent order passed by the 1st respondent.

4. In view of the above submissions, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous, with liberty to the petitioner Associations to challenge the subsequent order. Consequently, the connected M.Ps are closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar avr

To

1. The Commissioner of Civil Supplies, Chepauk, Chennai -5.

2. The Registrar of Co.op. Societies, Kilpauk, Chennai-10 +2cc's to Mr.C.Prakasam, Advocate, S.R.No.46708,46709 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.46857 W.P.Nos.13470 & 13521 of 2014 M.P.Nos.2 & 2 of 2014 AR(CS IV) CU(24/08/2017)