Madras High CourtWP/20996/2018dismissed for default

R.Chelladurai,S/O.K.Ramaiya v. The District Collector

2023-02-16Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan,Honourable Mr Justice Mohammed Shaffiq5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.02.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and W.M.P. No. 24662 of 2018 1.R.Chelladurai 2.K.Boopathi 3.A.Shajakhan 4.C.U.Venkatesh 5.V.Rekha 6.R.Padma 7.Isakkiammal 8.Murugesan 9.M.Etty 10.Anjalatchi .. Petitioners

Versus

1. The District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram-631 501.

2. The Superintendent of Police Kancheepuram-631 501.

1/5

3. The Section Officer Water Resources Organization Public Works Department Chembarambakkam Irrigation Division Kundrathur, Chennai-600 069.

4. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

5. The Tashildar Pallavaram Taluk Chennai-600 043.

Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 12.08.2018 in the light of the classification of land in Survey No. 351, Kovur Village, by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, and consequently, direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners' peaceful possession and occupation of the premises situate at Survey No. 351, (authorities alleged that they converted Survey No.351 as Survey Nos. 351/1 and 351/2). For Petitioners :

No appearance For Respondents :

Ms. R.L.Karthika Government Advocate (R1-R3) Mr. C.N.Vinobha (R4) (For CMDA) 2/5

O R D E R

(Order of the court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) On 14.02.2023, when the writ petition was taken up for consideration, there was no representation for the petitioners and hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 16.02.2023. Accordingly, the writ petition is listed today i.e., on 16.02.2023 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioners.

2. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

[R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 16.02.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking Order Maya 3/5

R. MAHADEVAN, J.

and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

Maya To