Murugan v. The State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eighteenth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.8647 of 2022 MURUGAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KITCHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.78/2022) For Petitioner : NO APPEARANCE For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- No representation for the petitioner.
2. The Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) states that the petitioner was arrested in the said crime. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. -sd/- 18/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KITCHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S B.SUNDARAPANDIYAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.8647/2022 Date :18/04/2022 CSK 21/04/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/