C.Venkatesan v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.No.18462 of 2015 R.SUBBIAH, J.

Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent-Police, in respect of the alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 379 IPC, in Crime No.93 of 2015, the petitioners have approached this Court seeking the relief of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have stolen PVI pipes belonging to the defacto-complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Thus, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought for grant of anticipatory bail.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the stolen articles were recovered from the accused persons. 5.Heard both sides. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that anticipatory bail could be granted to the

R.SUBBIAH, J.

ssv petitioners by imposing stringent conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the concerned Court, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Pallipet, Tiruvallur District, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent-police twice daily at 10.30 a.m. & 5.30 p.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Court within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. 31.07.2015 ssv Crl.O.P.No.18462 of 2015