Madras High CourtCRL RC/1198/2008dismissed for nonprosecution

Chinnasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-08-10Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.08.2016 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Crl.R.C.No.1198 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 Chinnasamy .. Petitioner Vs.

The Inspector of Police Kodumudi Police Station, Kodumudi, Erode District, Cr.No.32 of 2006

...Respondent

For Petitioner : No Appearance For respondent : Mrs.M.F.Shabana, Govt. Adv. (Crl.side)

O R D E R

Today, when the revision is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the name of the petitioner is printed in the cause list.

Mr.T.Muruganantham, learned counsel representing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he is going to appear on behalf of the petitioner, but he has no valid vakalat in his hand to file and to appear on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the criminal revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tsh https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To:

1. The Inspector of Police Kodumudi Police Station, Kodumudi, Erode District,

2. The Additional District Judge, FTC NO.I, Erode, (Crl.A.No.60/2008)

3. The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Erode (CC No.59/2006)

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.R.C.Nos.1198 of 2008 lrs co kra 02.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/