← Library
Madras High CourtOSA/250/2018dismissed as infructuous

Jayarani @ Ganapathi Muthu v. S. Visalakshmi Ammal

2018-07-13Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh,Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.07.2018 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH O.S.A.No.250 of 2018 Jayarani @ Ganapathi Muthu Senthatti Veerammal Nachiar rep. by its Power of Attorney Agent K.R.S.Ponnusamy Pandian ..

Appellant Vs 1.S.Visalakshmi Ammal 2.K.A.Murugappan 3.K.A.Velappan 4.K.A.Shanmugavel 5.Sri Gnanamani Ammal Chatram, Vannarpettai.

6.Thirukutralam Thirukutrala Nathaswami Koil Arthajama Kattalai.

7.Thirukutrala Nathaswami Koil Tharanipeedam Navarathri Kunkuma Seva Kattalai.

8.Thirukutrala Nathaswami Koil Sri Subramania Swami Kanthasashti Vizha and Thirukalyana Mandakappadi 9.Sri Thiripuramtheeswarar Temple, Sri Aavudai Amman Arthajamakattalai.

10.Sri Thiripuramtheeswarar Temple, Thaipoosa Mandakapaadi Kattalai.

11.Sri Thiripuramtheeswarar Temple, Thaitheppa Ursava Kattalai.

12.Sri Thiripuramtheeswarar Temple, Chitrai and Ippasi Festival, Naangammal Mandakapadi Kattalai.

13.Sri Thiripuramtheeswarar Temple, Navaraathiri Kattalai.

14.Sri Thiripuramtheeswarar Temple, Ippasi Thirukalyana Mandakappadi Kattalai.

15.Sri Ramaswami Koil Maasi Thiruvizha Ainthaam and Aaran Naal Mandagappadi Kattalai.

16.Sri Ayirathamman Koil Navarathri Kattalai.

17.Thiruchendur Sri Subramaniaswami Koil Avanithiruvizha, Maasi Thiruvizha Ezham Naal Sri Arumuga Nainar Irandam Sevai Vengu Pazha Velaisakthi Mandagapadi 18.Thiruverkadu Sri Vedapureeswarar Temple Vengu Pasha Attrural Chitra Pournami Mandagappadi 19.Sri Prasanna Vinayagar Temple, Park Town, Madras - 3 and its Sub Temple at Kulathur Sri Agastheeswarar Koil and Sri Akhilandeswari Temple Nithia Pooja Kattalai etc., Madras.

20.Ayya Subramania Mudaliar Ayya Thaiyalnayagi Ammal Samaya Ara Kalvi Nambakam.

21.Dr.V.Muthu Veerappan 22.M.Saraswathi 23.M.Thaiyalnayagi 24.M.Subha 25.M.Senthilnathan ..

Respondents Appeal preferred under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S. Rules r/w Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2017 made in A.No.3775 of 2016 in C.S.No.1364 of 1995.

For Appellant ..

Mr.M.Balasubramanian For Respondents..

Mr.T.S.Baskaran for R6 and R25 to R28

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) This appeal is directed against the order dated 12.10.2017 made in A.No.3775 of 2016 in C.S.No.1364 of 1995. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the suit itself has been dismissed for default. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal. Accordingly, the original side appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. However, liberty is given to the learned counsel for the appellant to make a mention for restoration of the appeal in the event of the suit being restored.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mmi To The Sub Assistant Registrar, Original Side, High Court, Madras.

+ 1 cc to Mr. T.S. Baskaran, Advocate Sr.46329 + 1 cc to Mr. Balasubramanian, Advocate Sr.46022 +1 cc to Mr. Balasubramanian, Advocate Sr.46022(25.07.2018) O.S.A.No.250 of 2018 (CS-IX) EU(25/07/2018)