Mrs.Manjula Santhanam v. R.Ravichandran

Bail Slip The Petitioner/herein/Accused was directed to the released on bail as per the order of this court, dt.26/02/2010 and made in M.P.1/2009 in Crl.R.C.1097/2009.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.09.2015 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN Crl.R.C.No.1097 of 2009 Manjula Santhanam ... Petitioner/Accused Vs.

R.Ravichandran ... Respondent Prayer: Revision has been filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the judgment dated 14.09.2009 in C.A.No.338 of 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC-V), Chennai, confirming the judgment dated 18.11.2008 in C.C.No.8510 of 2004 passed by the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. For Petitioner : M/s.G.Saravanakumar For Respondent : M/s.M.Vijaya Kumaran

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the matter has been settled in between the parties. The learned counsel also made an endorsement in the revision to that effect.

2. Recording the same, the Criminal Revision case is allowed. Accordingly, following the decisions of the Honourable Supreme Court in K.J.B.L. Rama Reddy vs. Annapurna Seeds [2005 (10) SCC 632] and Sailesh Shyam Parsekar vs. Baban [2005 (4) SCC 162], the conviction https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and sentence imposed on the petitioner by the Courts below are set aside. It is made clear that the fine amount, if any, shall not be refunded to the petitioner.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (J) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar ssv To 1.The Additional Sessions Judge (FTC-V), Chennai. 2.The V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. 3.The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. Crl.R.C.No.772 of 2015 tm co kra 12/10/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/