K.Gajalakshmi, v. The State Rep By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.02.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH Crl.OP No.1084 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.368 of 2018 K.Gajalakshmi ..Petitioner Vs The State Represented By Its:

1. The Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Kancheepuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Kancheepuram District.

3. B.Ramadoss Pillai

4. R.Muthukumarasamy ..Respondents Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, praying to permit the petitioner to mark Additional Statement & Marked the Document of trial of the case in C.C.No.197 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate - II at Chengalpet.

For Petitioner : K.Gajalakshmi (Party in person) For Respondents :Mrs.Kritika Kamal.P Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for R1 and R2 Mr.S.Shanmugavelayutham Senior Counsel for Mr.T.Vijayaraghavan for R3 & R4

O R D E R

The prayer sought for in the present petition is to permit the petitioner to mark Additional Statement & Marke the Document of trial of the case in C.C.No.197 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate - II at Chengalpet.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. By an order dated 06.11.2017 in Crl.O.P.No.7290 of 2017, this Court had directed the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu to expedite the trial in C.C.No.197 of 2011 and complete the same within a period of three month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3. It is now submitted by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Respondents 3 and 4 that though sufficient documents are given to the petitioner herein, she is not cooperating with the trial Court.

4. The grievances of the petitioner is that she is not able to mark certain additional documents before the trial court and therefore filed the present Criminal Original Petition.

5. It is needless to point out that, if at all the petitioner intends to file documents, it is always open to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the trial Court, which opportunity was not availed by all these time. In my view, it would not be appropriate to pass any other order in the present Criminal Original Petition.

6. In view of the above, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dh To

1. The Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Kancheepuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Kancheepuram District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. +1cc to Mr.T.Vijayaraghaven, Advocate, S.R.No.10370 +1cc to Mr.K.Gaja Lakshmi, Party in Person, S.R.No.10696 Crl.OP No.1084 of 2018 GMR(CO) RRK(02/03/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/