M.Rajamanickam v. S.Rajendran

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.09.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.BASKARAN S.A.No.1135 of 2006 and C.M.P.No.10252 of 2006 and S.A.No.1153 of 2006 M.Rajamanickam ... Appellant/1st Respondent/ Defendant in S.A.No.1135 of 2006 M.Rajamanickam ... Appellant/1st Respondent/ Plaintiff in S.A.No.1153 of 2006 ..Vs..

1.S.Rajendran 2.A.S.Selvaraju 3.S.Krishnammal ... Respondents 1 to 3/Appellants 1, 2 & 4/Plaintiffs 2, 3, 8 in S.A.No.1135 of 2006 1.Rajendran 2.S.Krishnammal 3.A.S.Selvaraju ... Respondents 1 to 3/Appellants 1 to 3/Defendants 2, 3 & 7 in S.A.No.1153 of 2006 4.K.Easwari Kannan 5.V.Muthulakshmi 6.K.Sathiya

...Respondents 4 to 6/Respondents

2 to 4/Plaintiffs 4 to 6 in S.A.No.1135 of 2006 4.Easwari 5.V.Muthulakshmi 6.K.Sathiya

...Respondents 4 to 6/Respondents

2 to 4/Defendants 4 to 6 in S.A.No.1153 of 2006 Prayer in S.A.No.1135 of 2006: This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code., praying against the Judgment and decree of the District Judge of Salem, made in A.S.No.27 of 2002 dated 28.01.2004 in reversing the well considered judgement and decree of the subordinate Judge of Mettur made in O.S.No.235 of 1999 dated 30.10.2001. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Prayer in S.A.No.1153 of 2006:-This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code., praying against the Judgment and decree of the District Judge of Salem, made in A.S.No.97 of 2002 dated 28.01.2004 in reversing the well considered judgement and decree of the subordinate Judge of Mettur made in O.S.No.239 of 1999 dated 30.10.2001. For Appellant : Mr.P.Jegadeesan in both S.As For R1 : Mr.J.Ramakrishnan in both S.As For R2,R5&R6 : Notice stage in both S.As For R3&R4 : Mr.K.A.Vimal Kumar in both S.As C O M M O N J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these appeals and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant and the said endorsement so made, these Second Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nvi To 1.The Prinicpal District Judge, Salem.

2.The subordinate Judge, Mettur 3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras +2cc's to Mr.J.Ramakrishnan, Advocate, S.R.Nos.63751 & 63702 S.A.Nos.1135 and 1153 of 2006 SKS(CO) CA(12/10/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/