Kavitha, W/O Senthil v. Ramasamy S/O Krishnan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:14.06.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN Review Application No.33 of 2017 in S.A.No.225 of 2011 Kavitha ... Review Petitioner Vs.

... Respondent Ramasamy Prayer:

Review Petition filed under Order 47, Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 114 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 29.11.2016 and passed in S.A.No.225 of 2011.

For Review Petitioner : No appearance http://www.judis.nic.in

T.RAVINDRAN , J.

O R D E R

No representation for the Review Petitioner. Review Petitioner called absent.

2.It is found that this Review Application has been adjourned now and then, at the request of the petitioner's counsel and despite the same, petitioner's counsel is not interested in prosecuting the matter. No further indulgence is required to be shown.

3. In view of the above position, the Review Application is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.

14.06.2018 mfa Index:yes Internet:yes Review Application No.33 of 2017 in S.A.No.225 of 2011 http://www.judis.nic.in