V.Ganesan v. Mrs.Kannagi Backiyanathan

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 31.07.2015 Coram:

The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, Chief Justice and The Honourable Mr. Justice T. S. SIVAGNANAM Contempt Petition No. 896 of 2014 1.V.Ganesan 2.G.Varadarajan 3.I.Vadivel 4.E.Sengodan 5.M.Subramaniam 6.K.Mani 7.K.Balakrishnan 8.M.Padmavathi 9.R.Kandasamy 10.A.Arumugam 11.K.Mani 12.G.Natarajan 13.M.Chidambaram 14.P.Danapal 15.A.Subramanian 16.V.Subramanian 17.M.Kuppan 18.N.Nallammal 19.S.Rajammal 20.N.Chandra 21.A.Molaiyan 22.O.V.Alamelu 23.Kunchithapatham 24.S.K.Shanmugam 25.K.Saminathan

26.K.Loganathan 27.R.Palanivel 28.S.Rajeswari 29.K.Duraisamy 30.K.Magadevan 31.K.Arumugam 32.S.Dharmalingam 33.V.Subramaniyan 34.A.Chandrabalu 35.P.Krishnasamy 36.M.Vasantha 37.P.Balasubramaniyam 38.K.Veerabathiran 39.V.Loganathan 40.T.Rajagopal 41.P.Chinnsamy 42.G.Julit 43.D.Arunachalam .. Petitioners vs.

Mrs. Kannagi Backiyanathan, I.A.S.

Secretary to Government Adi Dravider and Tribal Welfare Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

.. Respondent --- Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, praying to punish the respondent for the act of willful disobedience of the Order, dated 02.08.2011 passed in Writ Petition No.14967 of 2010.

---

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Thirupathi For Respondent : Mr. S.T.S. Murthi Govt. Pleader assisted by Mr.K.Karthikeyan Govt. Advocate (Edn.).

---

O R D E R

(Made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice ) Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Learned Government Pleader states that the order has not been complied with, since the petitioners have not submitted the particulars asked for, i.e., PAN Number, Bank Account Number, present residential address, Pension Payment Order, etc.

3. The petitioners are, thus, directed to submit the aforesaid particulars within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Learned Government Pleader states that on the particulars being submitted, the amount will be remitted within four weeks thereafter.

4. The aforesaid statement is taken on record. The copy of the proceedings be communicated to the individual petitioners. If the petitioners are not satisfied with the said proceedings, it is open for them to challenge the same in separate proceedings. The Contempt Petitions accordingly stand closed.

[S.K.K., CJ] [T.S.S., J.] ATR 31st July, 2015.

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.

ATR Cont. Petn. No.896 of 2014 31.07.2015