M.Panneerselvam, v. The District Manager,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.03.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.5495 of 2015 M.Panneerselvam ... Petitioner Vs The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC), Villupuram.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay subsistence allowance for the period of suspension from 11.8.2014 to the Petitioner and to conclude the enquiry in respect of allegation alleged against him within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar

ORDER

The relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the respondent to pay subsistence allowance for the period of suspension to the Petitioner and to conclude the enquiry within a stipulated time.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that during the pendency of the writ petition, shortage of amount was remitted, due to which, suspension order passed against the petitioner was revoked and he was subsequently, given posting. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that nothing survives for adjudication and hence, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-CCC) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mtl To The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC), Villupuram.

W.P.No.5495 of 2015 KJ(CO) GMY(22/06/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/