← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/8167/2020dismissed

Velu v. State Rep By

2020-06-05Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.06.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.8167 of 2020 1.Velu 2.Prabhu ... Petitioners Vs.

State by Inspector of Police, S-10, Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai.

(Crime No.722 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.722 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Amalraj For Respondent : Mr.K.Prabakar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1) (a), 4(1)(g) read with 4(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in Crime No.722 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 14.05.2020, the defacto complainant has received an information that three unknown persons were prepared the poisonous arrack. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, they pray for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners are arrayed as A2 and A3. The petitioners along with other accused prepared the poisonous arrack. He further submitted that earlier this Court has dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner on 27.05.2020. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and earlier this Court has already dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners and there is no change of circumstances in this case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 05/06/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT-II, ALANDUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPET [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S-10, PALLIKARANAI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

CC to M/S D.AMALRAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.8167/2020 Date :05/06/2020 MK:29/06/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/