K. Shanmugham v. Mrs Sulochana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.11.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY A.S No.145 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009 K.Shanmugham ... Appellant/Plaintiff v.

1. Sulochana

2. Gomathy

3. Thilagavathy

4. Uma

5. Adi

6. K.Sakthivel

7. Thulasi ... Respondents /Defendant Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure r/w Order 41 & 41 A of CPC against the decree and judgment dated 13.08.2008 made in O.S.No.6290 of 2006 on the file of IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Appellant :

No appearance For Respondents : Ms.R.Sripriya for Mr.V.Raghavachari - for R1 R2 to R7 - not ready in notice

J U D G M E N T

Consistently there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. When the matter was listed for hearing on 11.10.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, hence, the matter was adjourned by two weeks. Thereafter, when the matter was listed for hearing on 01.11.2017 also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter on 08.11.2017 under the caption for dismissal. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. In these https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

circumstances, this court left with no other option except to dismiss the Appeal for non prosecution. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Rj /sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The IV Additional Judge City Civil Court Chennai.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1 CC to Mr.V.Raghavachari , Advocate Sr.No. 79271 A.S No.145 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009 NM (CO) MLT 28/11/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/