Madras High CourtCRL OP/8206/2020dismissed

Mannar @ Ezhilarasan v. State Rep By

2020-06-05Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.06.2020

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.8206 of 2020 Mannar @ Ezhilarasan ... Petitioner /Vs/ The State, Represented by The Inspector of Police, Peerkankaranai Police Station, Chengalpattu District.

(Crime No.124 of 2020) ... Respondent PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.124 of 2020 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Prabakar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.03.2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 392, 397, 336 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.124 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused waylaid the defacto complainant, abused him in filthy language and also robbed Rs.3000/- and a cell phone from him. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that A2 has been released on bail and that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration for more than 70 days from 24.03.2020. Hence he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as A1 and his wife is arrayed as A2. They used to commit robbery by breaking open houses and that the petitioner is involved in five cases. Sofar, 56 sovereigns of gold jewels have been recovered from him. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Taking into account the nature of offence and the antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 05/06/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, TAMBARAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PEERKANKARANAI POLICE STATION, CHENGALPATTU DISTRICT.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLCIE, PEERKANKARANAI POLICE STATION, CHENGALPATTU DISTRICT.

CC to D.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.8206/2020 Date :05/06/2020 MK:29/06/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/