Karthik v. The State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.No.8199 of 2021

1. Karthik

2. Suguna ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, W-33, All Women Police Station, Madhavaram Range, Chennai.

(crime No.16/2016)

2. Praveena ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the charge sheet culminated in C.C.No.120 of 2020 on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Madhavaram and quash the same.

For Petitioner :

Mr. P. Rajkumar Pandian For Respondent :

Mr.A.Damodharan, Gov. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Original Petition with liberty to file a better affidavit and a petition.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IX) // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mrp To 1.The Inspector of Police, W-33, All Women Police Station, Madhavaram Range, Chennai.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras - 104.

+1cc to Mr.P.Rajkumar Pandian, Advocate, S.R.No.39294 CRL.O.P.No.8199 of 2021 PM(CO) SU(26/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/