The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Intimate Fashions India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 8/6/2016 C O R A M The Honourable Mr.Justice S.Manikumar and The Honourable Mr.Justice D.Krishnakumar Tax Case Appeal No.609 of 2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai.
...
Appellant/Respondent Vs M/s.Intimate Fashions (India) Pvt Ltd C/o.S.Venkatram & Co, Cas 218 TTK Road Alwarpet Chennai 600 018.
...
Respondent/Appellant Prayer:
Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai dated 28/6/2012 in ITA No.2116/Mds/2011 and against the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle II(3), Chennai-34 in PAN/GIR No.AAAC12706C dated 22/10/2010. For appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax.
For respondent : No appearance - - - - - -
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J) This Appeal has been filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Madras, dated 28/6/2012.
2. The substantial questions of law raised in the instant appeal are:- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the additions made on account of revision in Arms Length Price which resulted in adjustment of Rs.60,43,329/- for the assessment year 2006 - 2007 and Rs.11,03,219/- for the assessment year 2007 - 08 was not proper?
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the computing deduction under Section 10 B, freight, telecommunication charges incurred in foreign exchange are to be excluded from the total turnover?"
3. Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax submitted that the tax implication in the instant appeal is less than the ceiling limit fixed by the Circular bearing No.21 of 2015, dated 10/12/2015. He further submitted that as per the Circular, Tax Appeals have been instructed to be withdrawn, subject to the matters covered under the Circular.
4. Placing on record the above submissions, while dismissing the Tax Case Appeal No.609 of 2014, as withdrawn, substantial questions of law raised are left open. No costs. -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai 2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras B Bench Chennai 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle II(3) Chennai-34 +1 cc to Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar Advocate sr.30738/16 Tax Case Appeal No.609 of 2014 aa29/06/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/