G.Nagarajan v. The General Manager

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM 1.G.Nagarajan 2.R.Ramathilagam 3.M.Venkatesan 4.R.Rathinasamy ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The General Manager, (Administration), Gratuity Trust Fund, Head Office, Kilpauk, Chennai - 10.

2.The Regional Manager, Regional Office, Dharmapuri.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the individual representations dated 12.09.2018, 04.10.2018 and 08.10.2018 respectively made by the petitioners in the light of the circular vide order No.R.C.No.AGR3/67287/2013 Circular No.35/2014 dated 19.05.2014

issued by the 1st respondent with interest @ prevailing rate from the date on which the gratuity amount became due.

For Petitioners : Ms.Saritha For Respondents : Mr.K.Thirugnanam

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners made a submission that grievances of the writ petitioners had already been redressed during the pendency of the writ petition.

2. Thus, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. 29.11.2022 Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order / Non-speaking order To 1.The General Manager, (Administration), Gratuity Trust Fund, Head Office, Kilpauk, Chennai - 10.

2.The Regional Manager, Regional Office, Dharmapuri.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Jeni 29.11.2022