Sathya v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.03.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Sathya ... Petitioner Vs.
The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Ramanatham Police Station, Cuddalore District.
(Crime No.8 of 2026).
... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest in connection with Crime No.8 of 2026 on the file of respondent Police.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balaji For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(1), 303(2), 326(a) of BNS r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Act, in Crime No.8 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal transportation of 20 bags of river sand. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought anticipatory bail for the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and the property has been recovered. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), it is seen that the petitioner does not have any previous cases. This Court views the offence of theft of natural resources and its exploitation as a serious offence. However, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has no previous case, and upon the fond hope that she would mend 2/4
herself in future and would not come under the adverse notice of the respondent, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thittakudi, Cuddalore District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;
(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;
(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks, and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; 3/4
C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];
(e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.
18.03.2026 cda To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thittakudi, Cuddalore District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ramanatham Police Station, Cuddalore District.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
4/4