Rajesh v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.8987 of 2022 1 RAJESH [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 ELANGOVAN Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANDIMADAM POLICE STATION, ARIYALUR DISTRICT (CRIME NO.74/2022) For Petitioner : M/S M.SELVAM Advocate For Respondent : MR. S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act in Crime No.74 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The prosecution case is that on 25.03.2022, when the respondent police was on regular patrol, they found that the petitioner was involved in illegal transportation of 1/2 units of river sand in a bullock cart without any valid permit. Hence, the respondent police seized the vehicle.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any such offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he pleads for grant of anticipatory bail.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent raised objection for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners stating that the petitioners have illegally transported 1/2 units of river sand.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners on condition that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, in the District Collector's Fund and on such deposit and production of receipt before the learned concerned Magistrate, the petitioners may be granted anticipatory bail with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Jayankondan, Ariyalur District on condition that the petitioners shall execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a) Each of the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) before the concerned District Collector's Fund as non-refundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount, the same has to be deposited by the concerned District Collector to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust as non-refundable deposit.
(b) if the petitioners failed to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (c) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(d) the petitioners shall report before the Investigation Officer daily at 10.30.a.m., until further orders; (e)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(f)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(g)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(h) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
7. However, grant of anticipatory bail shall not stand in the way of the authorities to initiate confiscation proceedings relating to the vehicle involved in the offence.
-sd/- 20/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, JAYANKONDAM, ARIYALUR DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ARIYALUR(FOR INFORMATION) 3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANDIMADAM POLICE STATION, ARIYALUR DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ARIYALUR CC to M/S M.SELVAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.6007 CRL OP.8987/2022 Date :20/04/2022 RVR 27/04/2022