Paratasarady v. Sakthi Murugan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.06.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.No.8397 of 2020 Paratasarady

...Petitioner

-Vs1.Sakthu Murugan 2.State Rep by Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District.

(Crime No.Not Known).

...Respondents

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 2nd respondent Police not to harass the petitioner based on 1st respondent's complaint.

For Petitioner : Mr.L.Prakash For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Addl. Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent Police not to harass the petitioner based on 1st respondent's complaint.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Taking into consideration the nature of the dispute involved in this case is a money dispute, it is for the parties to adjudicate the same before the appropriate Civil Court and the respondent police will have no role to play in a case of this nature.

4. This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police not to interfere with the money dispute and it is open for the parties to agitate their rights before the competent civil court. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ub To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai-108.

Crl.O.P.No.8397 of 2020 VBA(CO) GMY(02/07/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/