Rajendhiran v. R.Sumathi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.02.2017 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.P.D.No.259 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 Rajendhiran .. Petitioner -Vs.- R.Sumathi .. Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order of the learned Sub-Judge Attur made in I.A.No.13 of 2013 in H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2012 dated 11.08.2014.

For petitioner ... No Appearance For Respondent ... Served-No Appearance

O R D E R

The revision petition is filed by the petitioner-husband against the order of interim maintenance to the wife and for litigation expenses. Even at the time of granting interim stay by this Court dated 27.01.2015, the petitioner-husband was directed to pay the interim maintenance to the respondent-wife, as ordered by the trial

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J srn Court. There is no representation for petitioner for the last two occasions and even today though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through counsel. Though the respondent-wife was served with notice, there is no representation for the respondent either in person or through counsel. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.02.2017 srn To The Sub Judge, Attur.

C.R.P.P.D.No.259 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 http://www.judis.nic.in