Shaik Azmathulla v. The Commissioner Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.04.2024 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI Shaik Azmathulla ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Police, Police Commissionerate, Avadi, Chennai, Tamilnadu - 600 054.
2.The Nodal Officer, Superintendent of Police - I, Cyber Crime Team, Ashok Nagar, Chennai, Tamilnadu - 600 083.
3.The Inspector of Police, T-12 Police Station, Trunk Road, Poonamallee, Chennai - 600 056.
... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.1 to 3 to remove the videos of the petitioner in all the social platforms and websites based on the petitioner's complaint dated 05.03.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prem Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ***** Page No.1 of 4
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to remove the videos of the petitioner in all the social platforms and websites based on the petitioner's complaint dated 05.03.2024.
2. The case of the petitioner is that, he is residing at Plot No.9, Anantham Nagar, Goparasanallur, Kattupakkam and he is working as a Manager in AKZO Nobel Limited, Goparasanallur. One of his co-tenant, namely Bipin Joseph have taken the videos of the petitioner and his wife in his mobile and uploaded the same in the social media. For removal of the same, the petitioner has made a complaint before the 1st respondent on 05.03.2024, however till date, the videos were not removed from the social media. Hence, the petitioner has filed the above writ petition.
3. Though very many grounds have been raised in the above writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, it would suffice, if this Court issues a direction to the respondents to remove the videos in all the social platforms and websites based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 05.03.2024, within a specified time. Page No.2 of 4
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents submitted that, the respondents are taking effective steps to remove the videos and he assured that videos will be removed as early as possible.
5. Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the complaint given by the petitioner, dated 05.03.2024 and take appropriate steps to remove the videos of the petitioner and his wife from all the social media, in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
01.04.2024 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order NCC:Yes/No sp Page No.3 of 4
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
sp To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Police Commissionerate, Avadi, Chennai, Tamilnadu - 600 054.
2.The Nodal Officer, Superintendent of Police - I, Cyber Crime Team, Ashok Nagar, Chennai, Tamilnadu - 600 083.
3.The Inspector of Police, T-12 Police Station, Trunk Road, Poonamallee, Chennai - 600 056.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
01.04.2024 Page No.4 of 4