← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/7585/2024granted

Munusamy v. State Rep By

2024-03-27Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan3 pages

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.115 of 2024 registered by the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 353 and 506(i) of IPC.

2. It is stated that the defacto complainant, Forest Guard had lodged a complaint stating that the petitioner was cutting Karuvelam trees in Arani forest and when he questioned that, he was threatened and abused.

3. However, taking all the other factors into consideration this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

1/3

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. At the time of executing the sureties, the petitioner may file an affidavit that he would not indulge illegal cutting of trees in the forest. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

27.03.2024 rjr 2/3

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

rjr 27.03.2024 3/3