Satya v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN CRL.A.Nos.603 of 2010 & 327 of 2011 1.

1.Satya 2.Selvam ..... Appellants/Accused Nos.1 and 3 in CRL.A.No.603/2010 Arun .. Appellant in CRL.A.No.327/2011/Accused 1 to Vs.

Inspector of Police, R1 Mambalam P.S.

T.Nagar, Chennai (Cr.No.41 of 2008) .. Respondent in both the Appeals/ Complainant Common Prayer:- Criminal Appeals are filed under Section 374

(2) of Cr.P.C., to set aside the conviction and sentence rendered by the court of Magalir Neethimandram at Chennai dated 08.01.2010 in S.C.No.261 of 2008 for offences under Sections 341, 376(2)(g) and 506(2) r/w. 34 of IPC and acquit the accused.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.Govindarajan Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants in both the appeals.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the appellant/accused have already undergone sentence imposed by the trial court. Thereafter, one of the accused had already withdrawn the appeal filed by him in Crl.A.No.543/2011 and the same was already disposed of on the same heading. Therefore, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has filed a report stating that the appellants in both the appeals had already undergone sentence and submitted the relevant records. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. This court perused the available materials on record. In view of the above, these appeals are dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS II ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To 1.The Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Chennai.

2.The Inspector of Police, R1 Mambalam P.S.

T.Nagar, Chennai.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High court, Madras.

4.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

lrs(co) krd 14/12 CRL.A.Nos.603 of 2010 & https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/