Udayakumar v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.04.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.7586 of 2021 1.Udayakumar 2.Karthick ... Petitioners Vs.

The State rep by The Inspector of Police, T-14 Mangadu Police Station, Chennai - 600 122.

(Cr.No.165 of 2021) ... Respondent Prayer:

Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.165 of 2021 on the file of respondent Police station.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Thirugnanam For Respondent : Ms.M.Prabhavathi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioners who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.04.2021 for the offence under Sections 294(b), 341 and 307 of I.P.C. in Crime No.165 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners along with the other accused are alleged to have attacked the defacto complainant.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties, of whom, one should be a blood related surety, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Sriperumpudur and on further condition that:

(a)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 29/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT SRIPERUMPUDUR

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU(FOR INFORMATION) 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T-14, MANGADU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI-600 122 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+2 CC to M/S.S.THIRUGNANAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.5533 CRL OP.7586/2021 Date :29/04/2021 RVR 30/04/2021