← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/7939/2021dismissed

K.Rajithkumar v. State Rep.By

2021-04-28Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of April Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.7939 of 2021 K.RANJITHKUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIKRAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, ARIYALUR DISTRICT.

CR.NO.106 OF 2021.

For Petitioner : M/S.K.GANDHIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent :MR. T.SHUNMUGARAJESWARAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC and 21 of Mines and Minerals Act in Crime No.106 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found transporting one unit of river sand in a tractor without any valid license. Hence, the law enforcing agency registered a case against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he sought for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Government Advocate submitted that the petitioner attempted to transport river sand illegally in a tractor. When the vehicle was inspected, one unit of river sand was found. He further submitted that the petitioner has involved in one previous case similar in nature and also a case under Section 302 of IPC, is pending. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner has involved in one previous case and also a case for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 28/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIKRAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, ARIYALUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.K.GANDHIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.7939/2021 Date :28/04/2021 RVR 28/06/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/