← Library
Madras High CourtWP/11363/2026disposed of

K.Thilipan v. The District Collector

2026-04-02Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE K.Thilipan, S/o. Kolanji, Thanthai Periyar Nagar, Kulumur Post, Sendhurai Taluk, Ariyalur District - 621 714.

..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Collector O/o. District Collector Office, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

2. The Revenue and Disaster Management Department Officer, O/o. Revenue Office, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

3. The Tahsildar, O/o. Tahsildar Office, Sendhurai Taluk, Ariyalur.

..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 02.02.2026 and consequently directing the Respondent correction of wrong entries made in revenue records in survey No. 297/3 to issue fresh FMB in the 26.5 cent situated Kulumur, Sendhurai Taluk, Ariyalur District accordance with law and pass such further or other orders.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.A.Parthasarathi For Respondent(s):

Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to correct the FMB sketch for the property more fully disclosed in the prayer of this Writ Petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 02.02.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. According to the petitioner, there are wrong entries in the FMB sketch for the property more fully disclosed in the prayer of the Writ Petition. Hence, the petitioner had given representation to the respondents on 02.02.2026, seeking for correction of wrong entries. Since the said representation was not considered, the petitioner has filed the Writ Petition.

3. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, the learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after considering due supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing all the necessary parties, within a time frame to be fixed by this

Court.

5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of, by directing the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing all the necessary parties, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 02-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Jer To

1. The District Collector O/o. District Collector Office, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

2. The Revenue and Disaster Management Department Officer, O/o. Revenue Office, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

3. The Tahsildar, O/o. Tahsildar Office, Sendhurai Taluk, Ariyalur.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

Jer 02-04-2026