← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10839/2022dismissed for nonprosecution

Sivarama Krishnan v. The Medical Council Of India

2026-03-17Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Sivarama Krishnan, S/o. Natarajan, Residing at 2nd Floor, DB Home Thoraipakkam, Chenani 97.

Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Medical Council of India, Aiwan -E -Galib Marg, Kotla Road, (Opp to Mata Sundari College for Women) I.T.O., New Delhi 110 002.

2.The Tamil Nadu Medical Council, No. 914, Poonamallee High Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai 106.

3.The Chief Doctor, The Apollo Speciality Hospital, 5 /639 Old Mahabalipuram Road, Tirumalai Ngagar, Perungudi, Chennai 96.

4.Dr. P R Damodaran, Chennai Ortho and Spine centre (COSC) 1st floor No. 25 Besant Avenue, Adyar, Chennai 20.

Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider petitioner complaint dated 08.03.2022 to take necessary action against the 3rd and 4th respondents as per Regulation 8 of Indian

Medical council (Professional Conduct Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002 within the time period fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner:

No Appearance For Respondent(s):

Mr.Sam Dinakaran Manuel for Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan M/s.Maimoona Badsah For R3

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 08.03.2022 and to take necessary action against the respondents 3 & 4 as per Regulation 8 of Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002, within the time period fixed by this Court.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3.Learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent would submit that the subsequent to the complaint received from the petitioner, action has been taken against the respondents 3 and 4 and the punishment was also imposed, which might be the reason for non-appearance of the petitioner.

4.The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent that petitioner's complaint dated 06.03.2022 has been considered and action has been taken against the respondents 3 and 4 is recorded. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

17-03-2026 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The Medical council of India, Aiwan -E -Galib Marg Kotla Road (Opp to Mata Sundari college for Women) I.T.O New Ddelhi 110 002.

2.The Tamil Nadu Medical Council, No. 914, Poonamallee High Road Arumbakkam, Chennai 106.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.

rst 17-03-2026