The Branch Manager v. Pazhaniammal

CMP No.9831 of 2024 in CMA SR No.114122 of 2023 N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J Affidavit of service has been filed.

2.The 1st respondent has been served. The 2nd and 3rd respondents are minors who are represented by the 1st respondent. Hence, notice to the respondents 1 to 3 has been served. The private notice that was sent to the 4th respondent has been returned with an endorsement "Refused". Hence, there shall be a deemed service on the 4th respondent.

3.There is no representation either in person or through counsel on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3.

4.This Civil Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 43 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 5.Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and perused the records. 6.Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 43 days is condoned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J ssr 7.Registry is directed to number the main Civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission. 27.06.2024 ssr CMP No.9831 of 2024 in CMA SR No.114122 of 2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis