Madras High CourtWP/11976/2025disposed of with direction

Uppilipalayam Housing Unit Senior Citizens v. The Principal Secretary

2025-10-24Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Uppilipalayam Housing Unit Senior Citizens Welfare Association, Represented by its President S.Manikandan : Petitioner Vs 1.The Principal Secretary, Housing & Urban Development, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The District Collector, District Collector Office, State Bank Road, Coimbatore -641 018.

3.The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation, Big Bazaar Street Town Hall, Coimbatore -641 001.

4.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, CMDA Complex, E&C Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai-600 107.

1/6

5.M/s.Auro Miraa Developers LLP, Represented by its Director, Mr.Shunmuham S.

6.The Joint Action Committee, Singanallur Veetu Vasathi Vaariyakudiruppu VeetuUrimaiyalargalOrunginainthaMaruKattamaipirkkana "KootuNadavadikkaikuzhu"

Represented by its Presient Mr.V.Jeyaram, TNHB Colony, Singanallur, Coimbatore -641 005.

: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 4 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.02.2025 within a stipulated time frame and pass orders.

For Petitioner :

Mr.K.Balasubramaniam For Respondents : Mr.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader

ORDER

The writ petition is filed for a direction to the respondents 2 and 4 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.02.2025 within a stipulated time frame.

2/6

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the president of the Uppilipalayam Housing Unit Senior Citizens Welfare Association has filed this writ petition representing the substantial number of flat owners of Singanallur Farmers Market under the Uppilipalayam Scheme, I, II and III constructed by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. He is also a flat owner of Singanallur Farmers Market under the said Scheme. It was constructed between the year 1983 and 1985. After five decades, the sixth respondent, the Joint Action Committee entered into an agreement with the fifth respondent. However, the agreement entered between them was not furnished to the petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition is filed. Therefore, this Court may issue direction to the 6th respondent to furnish the Scheme Agreement to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders.

3. In view of the above, the relief as sought for by the petitioner as against the sixth respondent is not maintainable. There was a dispute between the petitioner association and the sixth respondent/The Joint Action Committee. The said dispute have to be ventilated only before the Civil Court and not before this Court. However, the sixth respondent has agreed to furnish the said Scheme 3/6

Agreement to the petitioner association.

4. Recording the same, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 24.10.2025 Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order mrn To 1.The Principal Secretary, Housing & Urban Development, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.