Krishnamurthy v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.04.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR W.P.No.10463 of 2021 Krishnamurthy ... Petitioner

Versus

1.The Superintendent of Police Cuddalore Cuddalore District.

2.The Inspector of Police Kurinjipadi Police Station Cuddalore District.

3.Arumbu Ammal ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his relatives under the guise of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the third respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sunil Kumar For Respondents: Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition has been filed to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his relatives under the guise of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the third respondent.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent.

3. Taking into consideration the fact that the nature of the dispute involved in this case is a property dispute, it is for the parties to redress the same before the appropriate Civil Court and the respondent police will have no role to play in a case of this nature.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. This Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police not to interfere with the civil dispute and it is open for the parties to agitate their rights before the competent Civil Court. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dna To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kurinjipadi Police Station, Cuddalore District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.R.Sunilkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.26110 W.P.No.10463 of 2021 GJ(CO) GN(06/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/