P.Rajesh v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA W.A.No.1314 of 2019 P. Rajesh .. Appellant/Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Villupuram District, Collectorate, Villupuram.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, R.D.O. Office, Villupuram.
3.The Deputy Director, Geology & Mining, Villupuram.
.. Respondents Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 21.01.2019 made in W.P.No.1289 of 2019. Prayer in WP.No.1289 of 2019:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records in connections with the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer Villupuram the 2nd respondent herein in Na.Ka.No. A4/ 177/ 2014 dated 31.12.2014 and the consequent proceedings of the District Collector Villupuram Dated 20.04.2016 bearing Ref.No. Na.Ka. A/ G and M/ 1035/ 2013 and quash the same as the petitioners father Mr.Palanivel died on 10.11.2018 and issue such further or other appropriate orders or directions as this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, award costs.
For Appellant :
Mr.K.Raja for Mr.M.Kaviveerappan For Respondents :
Mr.D.Ravichander, Government Counsel https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) This appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge, who dismissed the writ petition, inter alia holding that the impugned order passed against the appellant's father and the appellate authority's order were not challenged and it is too late in a day for the appellant to do so even by way of abundant caution.
2.Though the learned counsel appearing for the appellant made submissions on merit, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the learned single Judge. The father of the appellant died in the year 2018. The order of the appellate authority was passed in the year 2016. The original authority passed an order in the year 2014.
3.In such view of the matter, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned single Judge. However, if the recovery proceeding is initiated, the appellant can challenge it in the manner known to law. Accordingly, the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mmi/ssm To 1.The District Collector, Villupuram District, Collectorate, Villupuram.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, R.D.O. Office, Villupuram.
3.The Deputy Director, Geology & Mining, Villupuram.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.31981 W.A.No.1314 of 2019 BR(CO) CB(06/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/