Mr.T.Vasu, v. The Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.01.2017 CORAM :

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P.No.9274 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 T.Vasu ... Petitioner -VsThe Commissioner, Udhagamandalam Municipality, Ooty, Nilgiris District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondent passed in Ref.U.A.C.No.05/1997/South, dated Nil March 2010, signed by the respondent on 11.03.2010 and quash the same.

For Petitioner :

Mr.V.Ramesh For Respondents :

Mr.Radhakrishnan, Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Sasindharan

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) On hearing the learned counsel for parties, learned counsel for the respondent-Municipality states that the impugned order is not sustainable and should be treated as withdrawn making it clear that if there is any other violation by the petitioner, it would be open to the Municipality to take action in accordance with law.

2.The aforesaid statement is taken on record. The impugned order, thus, remains no more in force in terms aforesaid. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2010 stands closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sra To The Commissioner, Udhagamandalam Municipality, Ooty, Nilgiris District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.2041 W.P.No.9274 of 2010 RSY(CO) CA(23/01/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/