← Library
Madras High CourtWP/6483/2015dismissed

N.Yashvanth Kumar v. State Of Tamilnadu

2019-02-08Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.02.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.6483 of 2015 N.Yashvanth Kumar .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylopore, Chennai-600 004.

3.The Additional Director General of Police, CBCID, No.220, Panthian Salai, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

4.The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District-641 018.

5.The Inspector of Police, Pollachi Police Station, Coimbatore District.

6.S.Selvanayagam, Sub-Inspector of Police, Pollachi Police Station, Coimbatore District.

7.Boopalan, Head Constable, Kinathukadavu Police Station, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District.

.. Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st to 5th respondents to consider the petitioner's representations dated 28.09.2014 and 25.11.2014 seeking for proper enquiry against the 6th and 7th respondents. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Agni Selvaraju For Respondents For R1 to R5 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the petitioner's representations dated 28.09.2014 and 25.11.2014, seeking proper enquiry against the respondents 6 & 7.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner submitted representations on 28.09.2014 and 25.11.2014 seeking proper action as against the respondents 6 and 7 for allegedly damaging his vehicle and for threatening him by foisting false cases as against him. But the respondents 1 to 5 have not taken any action as against the respondents 6 and 7, till date. Hence, he prays to allow this petition.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is an accused for the offence of transporting banned liquor bottles and a criminal case has been registered as against him in Crime No.295 of 2014 on the file of the Kinathukadavu Police Station for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(a)(Transport) of TNP Act. In order to escape from the clutches of law, the petitioner wants to take action as against the police officials, who are the sixth and seventh respondents herein.

4. Considering the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court feels that the petitioner is not entitled any relief as sought for in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mkn/rts

To 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

3.The Additional Director General of Police, CBCID, No.220, Panthian Salai, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

4.The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District-641 018.

5.The Inspector of Police, Pollachi Police Station, Coimbatore District.

6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.J.Agniselvaraju, Advocate SR.No.11271 W.P.No.6483 of 2015 VBA(CO) GMY(06/03/2019)