Dhilip Kumar v. State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.7693 of 2021 1.Dhilip Kumar 2.Anbarasan 3.Vinoth 4.Saran 5.Mehanadhan ... Petitioners Vs.
State represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Mel Chengam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
Crime No.62 of 2021 ... Respondent Prayer:
Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioners on bail pending investigation in Crime No.62 of 2021 on the file of the respondent.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Balakrishnan For Respondent : Ms.M.Prabhavathi Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
The petitioners who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.03.2021 for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 324, 354, 307, 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.62 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.
2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners are alleged to have attacked the defacto complainant. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.
5.Considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties, of whom, one should be a blood related surety, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Chengam and on further condition that: (a)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;
(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 28/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHENGAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVANNAMALAI(FOR INFORMATION) 3 SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MEL CHENGAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTIRCT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, VELLORE CC to M/S. R.BALAKRISHNAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.5462 CRL OP.7693/2021 Date :28/04/2021 RVR 29/04/2021