K.T.Kannapiran, Aged 69 Years, v. State By

Crl.OP. No.17209 of 2018 M.DHANDAPANI.,J Today, the matter is listed under the caption "for being mentioned".

2. In continuation of the earlier order of this Court dated 15.04.2021, the 2nd and 5 paragraphs of the order shall stand substituted as follows: ''2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the transaction was made in the year 1996. The complaint was lodged in the year 2013 and the same was registered in the year 2014. Till date, no action was taken against the petitioners. Therefore, he seeks liberty to the petitioners to place all the relevant materials before the Law Enforcing Agency.

3...............................

4...............................

5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate, this Court directs the Law Enforcing Agency to conclude the investigation within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and considering the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

M.DHANDAPANI.,J rli age of the petitioners, the Law Enforcing Agency is directed not to harass them and the petitioners are directed to co-operate for the completion of the investigation.''

3. All the other observations made in the earlier order dated 15.04.2021 shall remain intact.

16.07.2021 rli Crl.OP. No.17209 of 2018 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/