Esi Corporation, v. Hashmuk Kumar Jain

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P(NPD).Nos.1185 & 1186 of 2006 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2006 ESI Corporation, Rep. by Deputy Director (Recovery)

...Petitioner in

both C.R.Ps Vs

1. Hashmuk Kumar Jain

...Respondent in C.R.P.No.1185

of 2006

2. Mrs.Reshma

...Respondents in C.R.P.No.1186

of 2006 COMMON PRAYER:

Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, to allow the Civil Revision Petitions and set aside the order and decreetal dated 27.02.2006 made in E.A.No.6283 of 2005 in E.P.No.1991 of 2004 in O.S.No.6593 of 2002 and E.A.No.6284 of 2005 in E.P.No.1993 of 2004 in O.S.No.6595 of 2002 on the file of the learned IX Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai.

For Petitioner in both C.R.Ps : No Appearance For Respondent in both C.R.Ps : No appearance COMMON ORDER When the matters were listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 11.04.2018, there was no representation on both sides. Hence, the matters were directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal". On 21.06.2018, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner and the revisions were directed to be posted under the caption "for dismissal". https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Today, once again, the matters were listed under the caption "for dismissal". The matters were called twice in the forenoon and at 3.00 p.m, on all these occasions, there are no representation on both sides.

3. In the result, these revisions stand dismissed for nonprosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dh To 1.

The IX Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai.

2.

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras (2 Copies) C.R.P(NPD).Nos.1185 & 1186 of 2006 KJI(CO) CS/10/08/18 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/