Sathish @ Sathish Kumar v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.06.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN 1.Sathish @ Sathish Kumar, S/o. Sachithanatham, Male aged about 46 years, No.53/14, GS South Street, Mannarkudi Taluka, Tiruvarur.
2.Ponmudi, S/o.Kanthasami, Male, aged about 64 years, No.176, South Kandiyur Street, Idangakottai Melaiyur, 3.Kalaivanan, S/o.Vadivel, Male aged about 53 years, 38A, North Kandiyar street, Eda Melaiyur, Tiruvarur.
4.Dr.Vijayakumar, S/o. Narayanasami, Male aged about 56 years, No.22, Rukmani palayam Middle Street, MGR Nagar, Mannarkudi Taluka, Tiruvarur ... Petitioners / Accused 1-4
Vs.
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Mannargudi Town Police Station, Crime No.122 of 2020 ... Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.122 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.O.S.Thilak For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 323, 506(i), and 379 of IPC in Crime No.122 of 2020, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant had a relationship with the 4th petitioner's daughter. As a result, on 29.02.2020 the petitioners attacked the de-facto complainant and criminally intimated him by using abusive words. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant and the injured discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that there is no previous case as against the petitioners. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case and the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court
is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Mannarkudi, on condition that the each of the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when
required for interrogation.
[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter abscond/s, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
22.06.2020 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order smv
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J smv To
1. The Inspector of Police, Mannargudi Town Police Station,
2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.
22.06.2020