V. Thirumalai v. R. Gunasekaran

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A. No.377 of 2007 and MP No.1 of 2007

1. V. Thirumalai 2.Pattammal ...Appellants versus R. Gunasekaran

...Respondent

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S. No.77 of 2006 dated 24.11.2006 by the Principal Subordinate Judge Court, Tiruvannamalai, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S. No.967 of 2004, dated 28.02.2006 by the District Munsif Court, Tiruvannamalai. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Ms.Abbiraami for Mr.J.Ramakrishnan

JUDGMENT

(Heard Video Conference) There is no representation on the side of the appellants. However, the learned counsel for the respondent is present. Even on the last hearing date on 28.07.2021, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted before this Court that the dispute has been settled between the parties out of Court. However, on the last hearing date, the learned counsel for the appellants sought further time to get instructions with regard to the settlement of this matter. Since, there is no representation on the side of the appellants, today, it can now be inferred that the parties have settled the matter among themselves. Since https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the parties have settled the matter among themselves, this Second Appeal is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 To

1. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruvannamalai.

2. The District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai.

Copy to:

The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras S.A. No.377 of 2007 SR-II (CO) K.RK. (04.10.2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/