Ranjith v. The State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.7897 of 2021 RANJITH [PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GANGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM. (CRIME.NO.443/2020) For Petitioner : M/S. M.R. FRANKLIN Advocate For Respondent : MR. T. SHUNMUGARAJESWARAN Govt. Advocate ( Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Act (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.443 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found transporting one unit of river sand in an unregistered Bolero van at Swetha river bed. Hence, the law enforcing agency registered a case against the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he sought for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate submitted that the petitioner attempted to transport river sand illegally in a Bolero van. When the vehicle was inspected, one unit of river sand was found. He further submitted that the petitioner has involved in three previous cases similar in nature. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner has involved in three previous cases, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 27/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GANGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM.
2. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT MADRAS 104.
CC to M/S. M.R. FRANKLIN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.7897/2021 Date :27/04/2021 SP(24/06/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/