Sathish @ Vella Sathish v. State By, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.03.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Sathish @ Vella Sathish

...Petitioner/Accused 1

Vs.

State rep by The Inspector of Police, D-1, Triplicane Police Station, Chennai.

(Crime No.158 of 2025) ...

Respondent PRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.158 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.A.Vivek Ram For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Page No.1 of 6

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.03.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.158 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 125, 311, 351(3) of BNS, 2023.

2.It is the case of the prosecution that the defacto complainant was running a hotel; that the petitioner along with the other accused came to the defacto complainant's hotel and had food; that when the defacto complainant demanded the money, the accused, abused him in filthy language, assaulted him and robbed Rs.1,300/- at knife point. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and that in any case, considering the period of incarceration from 09.03.2025, the petitioner may be released on bail. Page No.2 of 6

4.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there is a previous case pending against the petitioner and he is on bail in that case. 5.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the nature of allegations, period of incarceration, the fact that the petitioner is on bail in the previous case and since further custody of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, and on further conditions that: Page No.3 of 6

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

20.03.2025 ata Page No.4 of 6

Copy to:

1.The Inspector of Police, D-1, Triplicane Police Station, Chennai.

2.The II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Puzhal.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page No.5 of 6

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

ata 20.03.2025 Page No.6 of 6