Muniammal v. K. Rajagopal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.12.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN S.A.No.168 of 2008 and MP No.1 of 2008 Muniammal ...Appellant/1st Defendant Vs.

1 K.Rajagopal 2 R.Gunasekar 3 R.Rajasekar

...Respondents/Plaintiff & Defendant 4&5

Prayer:- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 29.09.2006 made in As. No.239/05 passed by V Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai confiring the Judgment and Decree passed by the Trial Court made in OS.No.6927/95 dated 16.09.2004 on the file of VIII Asst.Judge City Civil Court, Chennai. For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : No Appearance

ORDER

When the Second Appeal came up for hearing on 20.10.2016, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he has no instructions from his client. The registered post sent to the last known address of the appellant returned as refused. An affidavit of service has also been filed along with returned postal cover with acknowledgment due.

2. Today, when the matter called, no one represented the appellant. Even though the name of the appellant is printed in the cause list, the appellant also absent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar jv To 1 The V Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 2 The VIII Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. SU(CO) RS(03/01/2017) S.A.No. 168 of 2008 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/