C.Ganeshan v. The State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of June Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.4236 of 2020 in CRL.OP.No.8298 OF 2020 C.GANESHAN [ PETITIONER ] Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE (CRIME BRANCH), F-5, CHOOLAIMEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI - 600 094.
CRIME NO.84 OF 2020 Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to amend The petitioner states that the case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant one s.subramanian was running the company named Sri Kailash Controls and from that Company M/s. Sri Ero Control was purchasing some accessories and in that transaction some fraud took place and regarding that a complaint was given on 26/09/2018 to register the F.I.R under sections 408,420,468 of I.P.C.".
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. N.GANESHMURTHY, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. M.MOHAMED RIYAZ, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:- This petition has been filed to amend Paragraph No.3 in Crl.OP.No.8298 of 2020 as "The petitioner states that the case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant one S.Subramanian was running the company named Sri Kailash controls and from that company M/s. Sri Ero Control was purchasing some accessories and in that transaction some fraud took place and regarding that a complaint was given on 26.09.2019 to register the F.I.
R under Sections 463, 464, 468 of IPC" instead of "The petitioner states that the case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant one S.Subramanian was running the company named Sri Kailash controls and from that company M/s. Sri Ero Control was purchasing some accessories and in that transaction some fraud took place and regarding that a complaint was given on 26.09.2019 to register the F.I.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. Heard both sides.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is ordered as prayed for.
-sd/- 25/06/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 XVII METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE SAIDAPET, CHENNAI 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE (CRIME BRANCH), F-5,CHOOLAIMEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI - 600 094.
C.C. to M/S. N.GANESHMURTHY Advocate on payment of necessary charges Order in CRL MP.4236/2020 in CRL.OP.No.8298 OF 2020 Date :25/06/2020 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format RVR 17/08/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/